Tuesday, March 27, 2007

What, How and Why

As a third-party competitive intelligence provider, Primary Intelligence receives numerous project specs and requests for bids, advice or consulting. By the time we hear about the project, our clients already know WHAT needs to be discovered and they want us to tell them HOW we will collect their data.

Logical. They want our expertise (or that of any third-party vendor) to make their efforts more effective. And Primary Intelligence exists to show companies how to grow market share, increase revenues and keep clients in the fold.

But, too often, nobody has considered WHY the information should be gathered.

For instance, one of our clients approached us with a formal RFP. From the content, it was obvious that there were concerns about sales effectiveness against a specific competitor. At the risk of:

*How is LaborFree’s sales organization structured (numbers; roles; management structure; span of control; by product)? Is there a sales organization chart that presents this structure? In a more general sense, is there a detailed, company wide org. chart? If so, please provide.
*To whom does sales report, both regionally, and at the corporate level?
*How are the sales offices geographically dispersed?
*What is the role, and extent of, inside sales?
*What is the typical, daily experience of a LaborFree sales associate (number of prospect/client contacts; “roll-calling” requirements; prospecting vs. account maintenance/growth; interaction with accountants and existing clients to acquire referrals; support from other LaborFree’s organizations and management, etc.)?
*How extensively do LaborFree sales associate make use of product demos in the sales process? Describe the typical sales call.
*Describe LaborFree’s discounting practices, at the time of initial sale.
*Does LaborFree raise its price over time to these customers who received initial discounts? Do these customers experience greater price increases than those who did not receive initial discounts?
*Are these price increases a major cause of customer losses?
*How does LaborFree calculate its customer retention rate (by client, or by revenues)? What has that rate been over the last five years?
*Does LaborFree use its LaborFree Agency commission revenue to support discounting to customers who use the pay-as-you-go insurance products? If so, to what extent?
*Number of orders submitted / % errors
*Number of payrolls setup / % perfect
*Number of first payrolls processed /% perfect
*Number of hot-start orders submitted / % actual starts
*Average cycle times
*How does LaborFree categorize its expenses? Provide specifics.
*As compared to SOFTTIME-ES, are similarly-labeled expenses actually alike, or are there definition differences? What are these differences?
*As compared to SOFTTIME-ES, does LaborFree match us expense-for-expense, or are there whole categories of expense not present in the LaborFree business model?
*Where LaborFree and SOFTTIME-ES expenses are similarly defined, where are their expenses materially less or more (proportionately) than SOFTTIME’s expenses?
*Per the above question, why are their expenses proportionately less or more than ours, for similar activities?
After five pages of this information, it was apparent that the CI group of this company looked like a Saturday evening DJ; taking requests and serving up the tunes. But the group wasn't doing their job of pushing back on the stakeholders and asking WHY.

Tomorrow, I'll examine a different course of action that eventually made a big difference in SOFTIME'S financial performance.

And, if you want to talk in the meantime, give me (Chris) a call at 801.838.9600 x5050.

1 comment:

Adrian Alvarez said...

I do more than agree with you Chris on this of the laundry list, we consultants sometimes receive from our customers. I believe that the missing question is not why but what for? You put it implicitly while explaining it. As customers would want intelligence and or information to improve their bottom line.

We usually begin and advise our customers to begin asking a series of questions to fine-tune each project. Among these questions are:

• What is the decision to be taken?
• What are the fundamental data the decision maker believes are essential for taking this decision? I believe that it should be clear for all of us that all projects are undertaken on a best efforts basis and that not all data/information can be obtained in an ethical, legal, budgetary way and within the needed timeframe.
• Why is it key to obtain these data? (there must be a clear rationale between the requested data and the decision to be taken)
• What are the budgetary and timeframe limits that we are subject to? Especially in tactical intelligence problems, the budgetary (and the project pay-off) and the time-frame might make some projects un-attractive.

If this is done in an effective way, we can successfully set the expectations of customers (also internal customers) and improve their satisfaction, which is also key to obtain more resources!

I hope I added something of value to your readership!

Adrian Alvarez
Midas Consulting
adrian_alvarez@midasconsulting.com.ar
www.midasconsulting.com.ar
Visita mi blog sobre inteligencia competitiva en http://inteligenciacompetitivaenar.blogspot.com/